1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 227 A.D.2d
  5. 227 A.D.2d 181 (1996)
 

JACKSON v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTH.

227 A.D.2d 181 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 7

Samuel L. Jackson et al., Respondents, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 7, 1996

Defendant's contention that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence is without merit, since there were valid lines of reasoning and permissible inferences that could lead to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented (Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 132). Testimony indicated that it was Transit Authority policy for a conductor, before signaling the motorman to proceed, to look up and down...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases