Defendant argues that the arresting officer impermissibly bolstered the victim's identification testimony when he testified in Spanish that the victim told him, in Spanish, that defendant had robbed him. Inasmuch as the trial court's inquiry of the jurors revealed that they did not understand the officer's testimony, no prejudicial bolstering occurred. Nor did reference to an identification procedure with respect to the codefendant bolster the complainant's identification...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
