Conflicting testimony in this medical malpractice action as to whether defendant deviated from good and accepted standards of medical practice in not performing a lumbar puncture raised issues of credibility for the jury's resolution, whose verdict on the issue of malpractice reflects a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Lichtenstein v Bauer,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.