The IAS Court correctly held that plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is not based on defendants' termination of her employment with them, but on their repeated and intentionally false post-termination representations to both the Unemployment Office and plaintiff's prospective employers that plaintiff had never been employed by them. We agree with the IAS Court that such conduct evinces an intent on defendants' part to ruin plaintiff's chances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
