HAFLEY v. LOHMAN

No. 95-3405.

90 F.3d 264 (1996)

Evelyn Susan HAFLEY, Appellee, v. Janette LOHMAN, Director, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; James Callis, Director, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Dean Powell, Assistant Administrator, Field Services Bureau, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Rich Lamb, Administrator, Field Services Bureau, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Raymond Hune, Director, Division of Motor Vehicle, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; William Siedhoff, formerly, Director, Division of Motor Vehicle and Driver's Licensing, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Mary Ann Reuter, formerly, Field Services Manager, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Lynn Bexten, Personnel Officer, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Zoe Lyle, Deputy Division Director, Motor Vehicle and Driver's Licensing, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; Ellie James, formerly, Administrator, Field Services Bureau, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri; William H. Melcher, formerly, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Department of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided July 19, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied September 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. McAdams, Jefferson City, MO, argued (John R. Munich and James R. McAdams, on brief), for appellant.

Lloyd J. Vasquez, St. Charles, MO, argued (L.G. Copeland, on brief), for appellee.

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 3, 1996.

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the eleven defendants, current and former employees of the state of Missouri, are entitled to qualified immunity. The District Court1 denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of qualified immunity, and we affirm.

Evelyn Susan Hafley is an administrative coordinator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases