The action was properly dismissed as against the individual defendant since, in the absence of the Connecticut home improvement license he applied for shortly after his engagement by plaintiffs, it cannot be determined whether he was acting in a corporate or individual capacity in performing work on plaintiffs' home. Moreover, payments by plaintiffs to the corporate defendant indicate that the corporate defendant was the entity authorized to work on plaintiffs' home.
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
