1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 78 F.3d
  5. 78 F.3d 266 (1996)
 

ROBOSERVE v. KATO KAGAKU CO., LTD.

No. 95-1371.

78 F.3d 266 (1996)

ROBOSERVE, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KATO KAGAKU COMPANY, LIMITED, a Japanese company, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 23, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied May 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric C. Cohen, Robert B. Breisblatt, argued, A. Sidney Katz, Laurie A. Haynie, Jerold B. Schnayer, Welsh & Katz, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerome H. Torshen, argued, Abigail K. Spreyer, Torshen, Spreyer & Garmisa, Chicago, IL, Michael P. Connelly, Kathleen A. Bridgman, Eugene S. Kraus, Charles P. Piacentini, Connelly & Schroeder, Chicago, IL, Nicholas J. Bua, Burke, Weaver & Prell, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before RIPPLE, MANION, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied May 6, 1996.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

On August 4, 1992, Roboserve, Inc. ("Roboserve"), sued Kato Kagaku Co., Ltd. ("Kato"), claiming breach of contract, wrongful termination, and fraud. The parties went to trial on October 18, 1993 and the jury returned a verdict in Roboserve's favor on all counts, awarding it compensatory and punitive damages totalling $9,950,000. Subsequently, Kato filed a motion for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases