LUSHBOUGH v. LUSHBOUGH


227 A.D.2d 110 (1996)

641 N.Y.S.2d 658

Marguerite M. Lushbough, Respondent, v. Channing T. Lushbough, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 2, 1996


We affirm on the ground that New York is an inconvenient forum, and therefore decline to exercise its jurisdiction (Domestic Relations Law § 75-h; see, Hellinger v Hellinger, 217 A.D.2d 490). The children have now been living with plaintiff in California for more than 2½ years, where they attend school and have almost all of their other connections (Domestic Relations Law § 75-h [3]). Furthermore, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases