IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST HARPER

No. 96-1551.

77 Ohio St.3d 211 (1996)

IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE HARPER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 5, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, Alvin E. Mathews and Harold F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

John C. Nemeth & Associates, John C. Nemeth and David A. Herd, for respondent.


BROGAN, C.J.

Respondent has objected to the board's recommendation, and raises the following four propositions of law:

"[I] The Board of Commissioners improperly reviewed this proceeding after the unanimous panel recommendation of dismissal.

"[II] The Board of Commissioners incorrectly found that Respondent's campaign television commercial undermined public confidence in the judiciary, when there was no evidence presented by Relator indicating any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases