1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 104 F.3d
  5. 104 F.3d 96 (1996)
 

U.S. v. REDDING

Nos. 95-1863, 95-1926.

104 F.3d 96 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis REDDING and William Perez, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry Rand Elden, Chief of Appeals, David Bindi (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Criminal Appellate Division, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee in Nos. 95-1863 and 95-1926.

Frank Wesolowski (argued), Lisle, IL, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 95-1863.

D. Cameron Findlay (argued), Sidley & Austin, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant in No. 95-1926.

Before COFFEY, FLAUM, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Dennis Redding and William Perez pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it. The district court sentenced both defendants to 90 month terms of imprisonment. Defendants now challenge their sentences, arguing that the court wrongly calculated their criminal histories under the Sentencing Guidelines. Because the sentencing court correctly interpreted the Sentencing Guidelines in calculating the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases