1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 75 F.3d
  5. 75 F.3d 1568 (1996)
 

PRO-MOLD & TOOL CO. v. GREAT LAKES PLASTICS

Nos. 95-1171, 95-1181.

75 F.3d 1568 (1996)

PRO-MOLD AND TOOL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREAT LAKES PLASTICS, INC., Defendant/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 7, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Zych, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Mark Levy and Brian J. O'Connell, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel.

Marshall Bennett, Jr., Marshall & Mulhorn, Toledo, Ohio, argued for defendant/cross-appellant. With him on the brief was D. Edward Dolgorukov.

Before PLAGER, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Pro-Mold and Tool Company, Inc. appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio holding U.S. Patent 5,224,600 invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and dismissing its patent infringement claim. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc. cross-appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing its counterclaim for unfair competition. Pro-Mold and Tool Co. v. Great Lakes Plastics, Inc., No. 3:93 CV...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases