McMORGAN & COMPANY, as Investment Manager and a Fiduciary of the Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
FIRST CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE CO., a California corporation, et al., Defendants.
And Related Counterclaims.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 17, 1996.
June 17, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Victor J. VanBourg, Christian L. Raisner, VanBourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff McMorgan & Company as investment manager for Pension Funds.
Judith Z. Gold, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant McMorgan & Company.
Roger McLeod, Gregory Lippetz, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants First California Mortgage Company and Dennis M. Hart.
Kevin W. Wheelwright, Hallgrimson, McNichols & McCann, Pleasanton, CA, for Counterdefendant Brad-Allen Properties/River Oas Oakland Limited Partnership.
Thomas Castle, Law Offices of Thomas Castle, Walnut Creek, CA, for Counterdefendant Branagh, Inc.
Hal Gazin, Reno, Nevada, in Pro Per.
Ralph R. Rhoades, James E. Sell, Lynch, Loofbourrow, Gilardi & Grummer, San Francisco, CA, for Counterdefendant Ghilloti Bros.
Charles J. McGuire, Strickland & Haapala, Oakland, CA, for Counterdefendant Branagh, Inc.
Samuel Goldstein, Walnut Creek, CA, for Counterdefendant Daniel Fox & Associates.
Steve Lanum, Charles Eisner, Boornazian, Jensen & Garth, Oakland, CA, for Counterdefendant Payne, Thompson, Walker & Taaffee.
Michael W. Valley, Mountain View, CA, for Counterdefendant Val-West Development, Inc.
Phillip A. Jaret, Robert S. Jaret, Jaret & Jaret, San Francisco, CA, for Counterdefendant Gosliner/McLean.
Louis Test, Hoffman, Test & Guinan, Reno, NV, for Counterdefendant ProMag, Inc.
Henry Batteate, Jr., San Lorenzo, CA, in Pro Per.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
In this complex ERISA action, defendant and counterclaimant First California Mortgage Co. ("FCMC") moves to compel the production of certain documents and for sanctions against plaintiff and counterdefendant McMorgan & Company ("McMorgan"). McMorgan brings a countermotion for a protective order barring discovery of the disputed documents. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the Court grants FCMC's motion to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
