BRANTLEY v. PISARO

Docket No. F023123.

42 Cal.App.4th 1591 (1996)

50 Cal. Rptr.2d 431

CARL H. BRANTLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANK R. PISARO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

February 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Dennis W. Dunn for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Curtis & Arata and Jack M. Jacobson for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

DIBIASO, J.

The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by respondent Frank R. Pisaro and thereafter entered judgment dismissing the action brought by appellant Carl H. Brantley. We will reverse. We will conclude that a defendant moving for summary judgment (or summary adjudication) under Code of Civil Procedure1 section 437c, as amended in 1992 and 1993, may still show the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases