GROTE v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER

No. 96-551.

682 So.2d 926 (1996)

Thomas W. GROTE, Mark Tauzin and Randy J. Landry, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

November 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel C. Hughes, Lafayette, for Thomas W. Grote et al.

John Conway Miller, Baton Rouge, for Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Before WOODARD, DECUIR and PETERS, JJ.


DECUIR, Judge.

This is a suit by three former stockbroker employees of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. asserting a claim for wages and penalties pursuant to La.R.S. 23:631 et seq. Merrill Lynch appeals from a trial court ruling denying exceptions of prematurity and no cause of action and finding that the parties did not have a valid agreement to arbitrate under La.R.S. 9:4201.

FACTS

Thomas Grote, Mark Tauzin and Randy Landry, in seeking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases