1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 78 F.3d
  5. 78 F.3d 1506 (1996)
 

U.S. v. BRUCE

No. 95-3087.

78 F.3d 1506 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Howard BRUCE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff Griffith, Griffith & Griffith, Derby, Kansas, for Defendant/Appellant.

Randall K. Rathbun, United States Attorney, Montie R. Deer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wichita, Kansas, for Plaintiff/Appellee.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Convicted of one count of extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and two counts of mailing threatening communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876, William Howard Bruce argues that evidence gathered in connection with his arrest should have been suppressed because FBI agents lacked probable cause to arrest him.1 Bruce challenges his Hobbs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases