1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 911 F.Supp.
  5. 911 F.Supp. 341 (1996)
 

ANTHONY v. BITLER

No. 95 C 3820.

911 F.Supp. 341 (1996)

Mark ANTHONY, Plaintiff, v. Carl BITLER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

January 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Segal, Segal & Segal, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff.

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court is the Motion to Enforce Subpoena Duces Tecum of Plaintiff Mark Anthony. Anthony is attempting to subpoena documents from a law firm and use the documents in his civil case in the Southern District of New York, Anthony v. Bitler, No. 93 6917. The law firm, McBride, Baker & Coles ("MBC"), contends that it need not honor the subpoena because it has an attorney retention lien over...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases