1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 922 S.W.2d
  5. 922 S.W.2d 311 (1996)
 

OVERTON BANK AND TRUST v. PAINEWEBBER

No. 02-95-124-CV.

922 S.W.2d 311 (1996)

OVERTON BANK AND TRUST, N.A., Appellant, v. PAINEWEBBER, INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

May 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Ray, Fort Worth, for Appellant.

Will S. Montgomery, V. Elizabeth Kellow, Thomas R. Cox, III, Dallas, for Appellee.

Before DAUPHINOT, DAY and RICHARDS, JJ.

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

The issue in the case before us is whether Overton Bank, as garnishee, was required to pay into court or freeze funds held under the title of a nominal party who was not named in the writ of garnishment. Because we find that this case is not distinguishable from the Texas Supreme Court's opinion in Bank One v. Sunbelt Savings,1 we reverse and render judgment that PaineWebber take-nothing in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases