1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 919 S.W.2d
  5. 919 S.W.2d 314 (1996)
 

BURACZYNSKI v. EYRING

919 S.W.2d 314 (1996)

Beveraly BURACZYNSKI and Stanley Parker, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Edward J. EYRING, M.D. et al., Defendants/Appellees. Carolyn BRIDGES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Edward J. EYRING, M.D. et al., Defendants/Appellees.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

April 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Mikel Dixon, Knoxville, for Appellants.

Alan M. Parker, Lewis, King, Krieg, Waldrop & Catron P.C., Knoxville, for Appellees.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to decide whether an agreement between a physician and a patient to submit to arbitration "any existing or thereafter arising controversy" is applicable to a medical malpractice dispute and enforceable under the Tennessee Arbitration Act.

The trial court denied the physician's motions to compel arbitration in each of two separate medical malpractice actions on the grounds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases