SMITH v. O/P TRANSP.

No. 21373.

918 P.2d 281 (1996)

128 Idaho 697

Billy Joe SMITH, Claimant-Appellant, v. O/P TRANSPORTATION, Employer, Boise Supply/Kayle & Marlene Hobbs, Employer, Indiana Truck Lines, Employer, and Employee Benefits Insurance Companies, Surety, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 1995 Term.

June 18, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cosho, Humphrey, Greener & Welsh, Boise, for appellant. Fredric V. Shoemaker argued.

Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for respondents. W. Scott Wigle argued.


SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission finding that Idaho's cancellation requirement of sixty days notice was not applicable to a former worker's compensation surety of Billy Joe Smith's (Smith) statutory employer. The Commission determined that the policy was not "issued against liability arising under" the Idaho worker's compensation law, but rather was issued against liability arising under Oregon's worker's compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases