1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 930 P.2d
  5. 930 P.2d 264 (1996)
 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE v. ENGLESTADTER

WCB 94-14109; CA A91707.

930 P.2d 264 (1996)

145 Or. App. 330

In the Matter of the Compensation of William R. Englestadter, Claimant. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE and United Parcel Service, Petitioners, v. William R. ENGLESTADTER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 24, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard D. Barber, Jr., Salem, argued the cause, for petitioners. With him on the brief was Bostwick, Sheridan & Bronstein.

Philip Emerson, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief was Brothers, Steelhammer & Ash.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred as a matter of law in relying on a medical opinion that had been provided before claimant's medically stationary date to determine the level of his impairment, and that substantial evidence does not support the Board's findings concerning the extent of disability. We conclude that the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases