1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 86 F.3d
  5. 86 F.3d 1098 (1996)
 

MAXWELL v. J. BAKER, INC.

Nos. 95-1292, 95-1293 and 95-1355.

86 F.3d 1098 (1996)

Susan M. MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. BAKER, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Prange Way, Inc., Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined August 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl D. Reiland, Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued, for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Daniel W. McDonald, and Alan G. Gorman.

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellant. Of counsel were Henry C. Dinger, John C. Englander, and Dana L. McAlister, Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, Boston, Massachusetts.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined August 28, 1996.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

J. Baker, Inc. appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in which the court denied J. Baker's motion for judgment as a matter of law after a jury verdict of infringement of claims 1, 2, and 3 of U.S. Patent 4,624,060, owned by the inventor, Susan M. Maxwell. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases