1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 232 A.D.2d
  5. 232 A.D.2d 936 (1996)
 

BARROW v. LAWRENCE UNITED CORP.

232 A.D.2d 936 (1996)

648 N.Y.S.2d 818

Dudley C. Barrow, Respondent, v. Lawrence United Corporation et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

October 31, 1996

Peters, J.

On a previous appeal in this action, we reversed an order granting plaintiff summary judgment based upon our conclusion that the purchase price adjustment clause in a contract for business assets acquisition between defendant Lawrence United Corporation (hereinafter LUC) as buyer, and Geer-Stillman Associates, Ltd. (hereinafter GSA) as seller, was ambiguous (see, Barrow v Lawrence United Corp., 146 A.D.2d 15<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases