MILLS v. PESETSKY

No. 103502, COA No. 157395.

556 N.W.2d 478 (1996)

William H. MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ann Z. PESETSKY n/k/a Anna Fugate, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

As Amended December 26, 1996.


ORDER

Having granted leave to appeal on May 1, 1996, and after hearing oral argument on November 12, 1996, we affirm the Court of Appeals decision to use the blending approach to determine whether the land contract was usurious. However, in applying the blending approach, the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the land contract was not usurious because that determination should have been made by the trial court given the lack of evidence on that issue before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases