1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 102 F.3d
  5. 102 F.3d 918 (1996)
 

GALLO v. AMOCO CORP.

No. 96-1518.

102 F.3d 918 (1996)

Matthew J. GALLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMOCO CORPORATION, as Plan Administrator, and Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and Participating Companies, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided December 17, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing Denied January 24, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Potter (argued), Miriam N. Geraghty, Jesse A. Wing, Kinoy, Taren, Geraghty & Potter, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Wilber H. Boies (argued), Nancy G. Ross, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and WOOD, Jr., and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied January 24, 1997.*

POSNER, Chief Judge.

Amoco Corporation administers a defined-benefits retirement plan for its employees that is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. A class action was brought on behalf of participants in the plan, charging that Amoco had violated ERISA by failing to compute benefits in accordance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases