1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 50 F.3d
  5. 50 F.3d 46 (1995)
 

CRAWFORD v. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

No. 93-1852.

50 F.3d 46 (1995)

Sheryl CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 31, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Harmon, Austin, TX, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for petitioner.

Jeffrey A. Knishkowy, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, was James M. Kelly, Associate Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Raymond W. Fullerton, Washington, DC, entered an appearance.

Before: WALD, SILBERMAN, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner, a horse owner, challenges a civil penalty imposed under the Horse Protection Act for "allowing" the entry of a "sored" Tennessee Walking horse in a horse show. We deny the petition for review.

I.

Petitioner Sheryl Crawford owns and shows "Supreme Image," a Tennessee Walking horse. Such horses are prized for their distinctive high-stepping gait. Unfortunately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases