PHILLIPS PIPE LINE CO. v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK REFINING

No. 94-5096.

50 F.3d 864 (1995)

PHILLIPS PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 17, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Burkhardt, Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman, Tulsa, OK (L.K. Smith, Boone, Smith, Davis, Hurst & Dickman, Tulsa, OK; and Don L. Jemison and Kenton J. Mai, Bartlesville, OK, with him on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Bernard A. Foster, III, Ross, Marsh & Foster, Washington, DC (Deborah A. Carpentier, Ross, Marsh & Foster, Washington DC; Charles H. Fleischer, Marsh, Fleischer & Quiggle, Bethesda, MD; and Richard P. Hix and Steven K. Metcalf, Doerner, Stuart, Saunders, Daniel, Anderson & Biolchini, Tulsa, OK, with him on the briefs), for defendant-appellant.

Before MOORE and TACHA, Circuit Judges; and ALSOP, Senior District Judge.


JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether Phillips Pipe Line Company and Diamond Shamrock Refining and Marketing Company have entered into an agreement for the transportation of product through a pipeline subject to the terms of the Interstate Commerce Act, which governs interstate oil pipelines. 49 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. The question is whether this regulatory scheme embodied by the filed rate doctrine supersedes a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases