MUSTO v. VIDAS


281 N.J. Super. 548 (1995)

658 A.2d 1305

WILLIAM C. MUSTO, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. VINCENT G. VIDAS, AN INDIVIDUAL; JOHN S. DEGNAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND SEMCOR, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 25, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne C. Singer argued the cause for appellants (Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, attorneys; Stephen M. Orlofsky and Ms. Singer, on the brief).

Ira G. Megdal argued the cause for respondent (Davis, Reberkenny & Abramowitz, attorneys; Mr. Megdal and Keith Waldman, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WALLACE and KLEINER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by WALLACE, J.A.D.

Plaintiff William C. Musto filed his complaint in December 1990, alleging oppression and breach of fiduciary duties owed to him as the minority shareholder. The trial court concluded that defendants Vincent G. Vidas and John S. Degnan had oppressed plaintiff and ordered reinstatement of plaintiff as officer and director of Semcor, awarded compensatory damages, and required defendants to sell their shares of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases