STATE EX REL. FAIN v. SUMMIT CTY. ADULT PROBATION DEPT.

No. 94-2533.

71 Ohio St.3d 658 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. FAIN, APPELLANT, v. SUMMIT COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 5, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayward L. Fain, pro se.

Donna J. Carr, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and James W. Armstrong, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, a relator has the burden of establishing that he has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 589, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1192. In determining whether a complaint states...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases