CONKLIN v. HANNOCH WEISMAN, P.C.


281 N.J. Super. 448 (1995)

658 A.2d 322

NATHAN CONKLIN, RICHARD CONKLIN, FRANK CONKLIN, III AND AUDREY CONKLIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRANK CONKLIN, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HANNOCH WEISMAN, P.C. AND CARLETON R. KEMPH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 23, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence B. Orloff argued the cause for appellants (Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Mr. Orloff, of counsel and on the brief; Linda S. Moore, on the brief).

John B. Collins argued the cause for respondents (Bongiovanni, Collins & Warden, attorneys; Mr. Collins, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY, ARNOLD M. STEIN and PAUL G. LEVY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, P.J.A.D.

This is an action for legal malpractice. We granted defendants' motion for leave to appeal from an order for a partial new trial. After an eleven-week trial, the jury found by its answers to special interrogatories that there was malpractice, but that the malpractice did not proximately cause plaintiffs' losses. The trial judge concluded that the issue of proximate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases