Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record demonstrates that there is an absence of privity of contract between the plaintiff and the defendant Robert E. Koke. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly held that the proposed amendment of the complaint, which sought to add a cause of action against Koke for damages for legal malpractice, is without merit (see, Weiss v Manfredi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.