SKURA v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.


213 A.D.2d 472 (1995)

624 N.Y.S.2d 893

Cinthia Skura, Appellant, v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al., Defendants, and Robert E. Koke, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 13, 1995


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record demonstrates that there is an absence of privity of contract between the plaintiff and the defendant Robert E. Koke. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly held that the proposed amendment of the complaint, which sought to add a cause of action against Koke for damages for legal malpractice, is without merit (see, Weiss v Manfredi, 83 N.Y.2d 974

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases