KIMMEL v. PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON


214 A.D.2d 453 (1995)

625 N.Y.S.2d 202

Sidney Kimmel et al., Appellants, v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 20, 1995


Since the Notice to Admit predominantly seeks admissions as to material and ultimate issues, and legal conclusions on material issues, as opposed to admissions confirming matters where "there can be no substantial dispute at the trial" (CPLR 3123 [a]), the Notice to Admit was properly stricken. (See, e.g., Hodes v City of New York, 165 A.D.2d 168.) As to the interrogatories at issue, it is clear that they improperly request...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases