CENT. MOTORS CORP. v. CITY OF PEPPER PIKE

No. 94-375.

73 Ohio St.3d 581 (1995)

CENTRAL MOTORS CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. CITY OF PEPPER PIKE ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thompson, Hine & Flory, David L. Parham and Karen E. Rubin, for appellee.

Walter & Haverfield, Christopher L. Gibbon and R. Todd Hunt, for appellants.

John E. Gotherman and Malcolm C. Douglas, urging reversal for amici curiae, Ohio Municipal League and Ohio Municipal Attorneys Association.

Clarence D. Rogers; Zashin, Rich & Sutula and Robert I. Zashin, urging reversal for amicus curiae, residents of the city of Pepper Pike.


COOK, J.

In this case we are asked to determine whether Pepper Pike's zoning of CMC's property is unconstitutional and whether Pepper Pike had used its one opportunity to rezone to cure the constitutional defect, thereby allowing the judicial rezoning of the property. We hold that the zoning ordinance is constitutional and, thus, do not reach the issue of whether judicial rezoning was proper.

Neither party contests the legal principles governing this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases