U.S. v. HURLEY

Nos. 93-1511, 93-2206, 94-1508, 93-1560-93-1563, 93-1616, 93-1617, 93-2207, 94-1507 and 94-1388.

63 F.3d 1 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent HURLEY, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Carlo DeMARCO, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James SACCOCCIO, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stanley CIRELLA, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kenneth SACCOCCIO, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stephen PIZZO, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Donna SACCOCCIA, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony DeMARCO, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided July 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrance Reed, Washington, DC and Edward C. Roy, Providence, RI, with whom Reed & Hostage, Washington, DC, Roy & Cook, James T. McCormick, McKenna & McCormick, Michael C. Andrews, Mary June Ciresi, Vincent Indeglia, Indeglia & Associates, Providence, RI, Richard Inglis, and Gargiulo, Rudnick & Gargiulo, Boston, MA, were on joint briefs, for appellants Donna Saccoccia, Stanley Cirella, Kenneth Saccoccio, Vincent Hurley, James Saccoccio, Carlo DeMarco and Stephen Pizzo.

Robert D. Watt, Jr., Providence, RI, for appellant Anthony DeMarco.

Kathleen A. Felton, Criminal Div., Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice and Michael P. Iannotti, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Sheldon Whitehouse, U.S. Atty., James H. Leavey and Michael E. Davitt, Asst. U.S. Attys., Providence, RI, and John P. Elwood, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, were on joint brief, for U.S.

Before SELYA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.


BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

The eight appellants challenge their convictions, sentences and forfeitures for their participation in an extensive money laundering operation organized by Stephen Saccoccia. His conviction and sentence were affirmed in United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754 (1st Cir.1995). In this case, we affirm the convictions of the eight appellants before us, their sentences, and the forfeiture orders entered against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases