STATE EX REL. LEACH v. SCHOTTEN

No. 94-1594.

73 Ohio St.3d 538 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. LEACH, APPELLANT, v. SCHOTTEN, WARDEN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 30, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Letson, Griffith, Woodall & Lavelle Co., L.P.A., and Lynn B. Griffith III, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Miltina A. Hicks, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Leach had to establish that he possesses a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that Schotten is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that Leach has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 65, 637 N.E.2d 1.

Leach contends in his first proposition of law that a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases