LIPTON v. NATURE CO.

No. 1858, Docket 94-9123.

71 F.3d 464 (1995)

James LIPTON, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. The NATURE COMPANY, dba The Nature Company of California, Defendant-Cross-Claimant, Michael Wein, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, Animal Wisdom Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided November 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy J. Felsten, New York City (Marcia B. Paul, Kay Collyer & Boose, New York City, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.

L. Donald Prutzman, New York City (Stecher Jaglom & Prutzman, New York City, John P. Sutton, Haverstock, Medlen & Carroll, San Francisco, California, on the brief) for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants.

Before: MINER, MAHONEY, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.


JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard Owen, Judge), granting plaintiff-appellee James Lipton's ("Lipton") motion for summary judgment on his copyright and Lanham Act claims against defendants Animal Wisdom Enterprises, Inc. ("AWE"), its president and principal stockholder, Michael Wein ("Wein"), and The Nature Company, ("Nature").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases