We agree with the IAS Court that the policy in question, which excludes coverage for "bodily injury to any employee of any named insured," unambiguously applies to bar coverage to an additional insured, such as appellants, against a claim by the primary insured's employee. As the provisions are clear and unambiguous, we must give them their plain and ordinary meaning, and refrain from rewriting the agreement (see, United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v Annunziata...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
