The facts set forth herein are taken from the plaintiff's complaint. Since we are dealing with an appeal from an order granting, in part, and denying, in part, a motion to dismiss that complaint for failure to state a cause of action, we must assume for the purposes of this appeal that all of these facts are true, and resolve all inferences reasonably flowing from them in favor of the plaintiff (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MULDER v. DONALDSON, LUFKIN
208 A.D.2d 301 (1995)
Joseph M. Mulder, Respondent-Appellant, v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Appellant-Respondent, and Robert Albano, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 7, 1995
March 7, 1995
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
ELLERIN, J. P., WALLACH and NARDELLI, JJ., concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.