REED v. MITCHELL & TIMBANARD, P.C.

No. 1 CA-CV 92-0348.

183 Ariz. 313 (1995)

903 P.2d 621

Jackqueline L. REED, a single woman, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MITCHELL & TIMBANARD, P.C., an Arizona corporation; Sheldon Mitchell and Jane Doe Mitchell, husband and wife; Kerry B. Moore and John Doe Moore, wife and husband, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

Review Denied September 26, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Gorman and Deborah A. Nastro, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee.

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. by Daniel Cracchiolo, Daryl Manhart and Karen J. Williams, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.


OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The Defendants are a law firm and lawyers who represented the Plaintiff, Jackqueline Reed, in a divorce proceeding. Reed sued them, alleging that they failed to adequately secure a promissory note given to her by her former husband. The Defendants moved for summary judgment and partial summary judgment on the grounds, among others, that Reed's malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations. Because the trial

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases