HANCOCK v. R.A. EARNHARDT TEXTILE MACH. DIV., INC.

No. 93-212.

139 N.H. 356 (1995)

STEVEN HANCOCK v. R.A. EARNHARDT TEXTILE MACHINERY DIVISION, INC. & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

January 31, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burns, Bryant, Hinchey, Cox & Schulte, P.A. of Dover (James H. Schulte on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Upton, Sanders & Smith, of Concord (Gilbert Upton on the brief, and Russell F. Hilliard orally), for defendant R.A. Earnhardt Textile Machinery Division, Inc.

Wadleigh, Starr, Peters, Dunn & Chiesa, of Manchester (Dean B. Eggert on the brief and orally), for defendant Blumenthal Mills, Inc.


HORTON, J.

The plaintiff, Steven Hancock, appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) directing a verdict for defendant Blumenthal Mills, Inc. (Blumenthal) in his action for negligence and strict liability. At the close of the plaintiff's evidence, the trial court granted Blumenthal's motion for dismissal or directed verdict on the ground that the plaintiff failed to produce evidence sufficient to prove that Blumenthal ever owned the machine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases