NATL. CHURCH RESIDENCE v. LICKING CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 94-1625.

73 Ohio St.3d 397 (1995)

NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCE, APPELLANT, v. LICKING COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 30, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd W. Sleggs, for appellant.

Robert L. Becker, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Pauline E. O`Neill, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

National Church principally contends that the BTA erred in rejecting its evidence on expenses. We disagree.

A taxpayer has the duty to prove his right to a reduction in value. Zindle v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 202, 203, 542 N.E.2d 650, 651. Furthermore, the BTA has wide discretion in granting weight to evidence and credibility to witnesses. We will not reverse the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases