The evidence submitted by the Attorney General in opposition to respondent-appellant's motion to dismiss was sufficient to demonstrate that the respondent corporations engaged in purposeful activities in this State in relation to the transactions in issue, for the benefit of and with the knowledge and consent of the individual Texas respondent, and that he exercised substantial control over the corporations in the matters under review (Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ALLIED MKTG. GROUP, INC.
213 A.D.2d 256 (1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 816
The People of the State of New York, by Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of The State of New York, Respondent, v. Allied Marketing Group, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Stevan A. Hammond, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 16, 1995
March 16, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
