When Pacific salmon were initially introduced into Lakes Ontario and Erie, it was believed that the species would not take a lure during their migration within tributaries of the lakes and that the fish were destined to die after spawning. Accordingly, respondent State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter the Department) allowed the practice of snatching
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PAC. SALMON v. ENCON
208 A.D.2d 241 (1995)
In the Matter of Pacific Salmon Unlimited et al., Respondents, v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 23, 1995
February 23, 1995
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
CARDONA, P. J., MIKOLL, WHITE and YESAWICH JR., JJ., concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.