1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 281 N.J.
  5. 281 N.J. Super. 39 (1995)
 

HARRINGTON v. HARRINGTON

281 N.J. Super. 39 (1995)

656 A.2d 456

ELISE HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEVIN HARRINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 20, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noel S. Tonneman argued the cause for appellant (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; David M. Wildstein, of counsel; Mr. Wildstein and Ms. Tonneman, on the brief).

Bruce H. Nagel argued the cause for respondent (Nagel and Rice, attorneys; Mr. Nagel, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LANDAU and CONLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONLEY, J.A.D.

These are two consolidated appeals by defendant arising from the trial judge's factual determination, rendered without a plenary hearing, that on May 3, 1993 the parties had reached a binding oral property settlement agreement. As a consequence of that determination, on October 21, 1993 an order was entered directing that the parties' agreement was "hereby enforced", and various other more specific enforcement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases