OMELUK v. LANGSTEN SLIP & BATBYGGERI A/S

No. 93-35389.

52 F.3d 267 (1995)

Janusz OMELUK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANGSTEN SLIP & BATBYGGERI A/S, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 14, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lucy Lee Helm, Riddell, Williams, Bullitt & Walkinshaw, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellee.

William Bishin (argued), Seattle, WA; and James M. Beard (on the briefs), Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellant.

Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

The sole issue before us is whether the defendant's contacts with the forum adequately supported the exercise of personal jurisdiction. We affirm the district court's dismissal, because they did not.

I. FACTS

The case was dismissed on what was called a motion for summary judgment based on lack of jurisdiction, but more properly should be considered a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases