U.S. CORRECTIONS CORP. v. ODIR

No. 94-1290.

73 Ohio St.3d 210 (1995)

U.S. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 16, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Robert G. Stachler and Mark G. Kobasuk, for appellee USCC.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and James W. Harper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee board of commissioners.

Betty D. Montgomery, Ohio Attorney General, Dan E. Bellville and Katherine A. Francis, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants ODIR and Stozich.

Kircher, Robinson, Cook, Newman & Welch and Thomas J. Kircher, for appellant Monahan.

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, N. Victor Goodman and Mark D. Tucker, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio State Building and Construction Trades Council.


DOUGLAS, J.

The court of appeals' majority reversed the judgment of the trial court, finding that the existence of genuine issues of material fact precluded summary disposition of the case. We agree that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, but for different reasons than stated by the court of appeals' majority. Specifically, we find that summary disposition of this case was proper, but that the trial court entered judgment in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases