STATE EX REL. CRANDALL, PHEILS & WISNIEWSKI v. DECESSNA

No. 95-64.

73 Ohio St.3d 180 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. CRANDALL, PHEILS & WISNIEWSKI ET AL., v. DECESSNA JUDGE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 16, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pheils & Wisniewski and David R. Pheils, Jr., for relators.

Rayle & Matthews, Max E. Rayle and Mimi S. Yoon, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Relators assert in their first and second propositions of law that they are entitled to a writ of prohibition. To obtain a writ of prohibition, relators must establish (1) that Judge DeCessna is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that denying the writ would result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Fowler...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases