STATE v. MAXFIELD

90CR0576; CA A80109.

891 P.2d 1342 (1995)

133 Or. App. 371

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Christine Cara MAXFIELD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Allan E. Smith, Certified Law Student, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Defendant appeals her convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence that was seized from her residence pursuant to a search warrant. Defendant argues that the affidavit in support of the warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause to believe that seizable evidence would be found at her residence. We agree with defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases