1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 891 P.2d
  5. 891 P.2d 1331 (1995)
 

GAGE v. CITY OF PORTLAND

93-030; CA A86719.

891 P.2d 1331 (1995)

133 Or. App. 346

Dorothy GAGE and Ashcreek Neighborhood Association, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PORTLAND and FP-35 Partners, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Sullivan, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Preston Gates & Ellis.

Jeff H. Bachrach, Portland, argued the cause for respondent FP-35 Partners. With him on the brief was O'Donnell Ramis Crew Corrigan & Bachrach and Peter A. Kasting and Office of City Atty.

Peter A. Kasting, Portland, waived oral argument for respondent City of Portland.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

De MUNIZ, Judge.

Petitioners oppose an amendment to a planned unit development (PUD) for which respondent FP-35 Partners applied and which the City of Portland's hearings officer approved. The city had approved the original preliminary development plan in 1981 and granted final approval of the original plan in 1984. The amendment was sought in 1991. Between the time of the approval of the original plan and the application for the amendment, the city adopted PCC Chapter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases