Petitioner PH II, Inc., seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to set aside its order sustaining a demurrer to portions of two causes of action. We do not reach the merits but resolve this matter on a procedural issue after supplemental briefing by the parties. We affirm the rule that a party may not demur to a portion of a cause of action (Grieves v.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PH II, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT
33 Cal.App.4th 1680 (1995)
40 Cal. Rptr.2d 169
PH II, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; WILLIAM C. IBERSHOF et al., Real Parties in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 11, 1995.
April 11, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Coudert Brothers, Robert A. Christopher and Adam R. Bernstein for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Ibershof & Dole and Stuart R. Dole for Real Parties in Interest.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.