1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 891 P.2d
  5. 891 P.2d 686 (1995)
 

HOKE v. MAY DEPARTMENT STORES CO.

No. 9302-01301; CA A83404.

891 P.2d 686 (1995)

133 Or. App. 410

Tammy HOKE, an individual, Appellant, v. The MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, a New York corporation, dba Meier & Frank Co., Meier & Frank Company, an Oregon corporation, Respondents, and Percy Winters, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 8, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. McGlone, III, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for appellant.

Robert D. Bulkley, Jr., argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief were Barrie J. Herbold and Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, P.C.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's granting of summary judgment to The May Department Stores Company (defendant).1 We write only to address plaintiff's claims of negligent supervision and retention. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether defendant established that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases